a |
e |
i |
o |
u |
v | |||||
ga |
ka |
ge |
gi |
go |
gu |
gv | ||||
ha |
he |
hi |
ho |
hu |
hv | |||||
la |
le |
li |
lo |
lu |
lv | |||||
ma |
me |
mi |
mo |
mu |
Ø | |||||
na |
hna |
nah |
ne |
ni |
no |
nu |
nv | |||
qua |
que |
qui |
quo |
quu |
quv | |||||
sa |
s |
se |
si |
so |
su |
sv | ||||
da |
ta |
de |
te |
di |
ti |
do |
du |
dv | ||
dla |
tla |
tle |
tli |
tlo |
tlu |
tlv | ||||
tsa |
tse |
tsi |
tso |
tsu |
tsv | |||||
wa |
we |
wi |
wo |
wu |
wv | |||||
ya |
ye |
yi |
yo |
yu |
yv | |||||
(DO), which I had to invert because it appears upside down:
(thirteen from the left in line three of the original document)
(YO), which was missing its loop at the top:
(ten from the left in line two of the original document)
(WA) and pasted it to the stump to create this form. I tried the same thing using the loops from
(HI),
(TSI),
(GU), and
(GA), but the
(WA) loop seemed to create the best effect. Here's what a couple of the others looked like:
(from the HI loop),
(from the TSI loop)
If one of these looks better to you, please let me know.
(TLA), which was derived from
(leftmost item in line six of the original document) by lengthening the horizontal line in order to disambiguate it from
(LI) which was likewise derived from this character for lack of a better source.
(LI), which was created by removing the short vertical stroke in the bottom right corner of
. I would have preferred a larger loop on the top, and I attempted to invert
(DA) for this purpose, but the resulting backwards slant did not fit in
well with the other characters when combined in text. Here's what that
looked like:
(TLI), which I created by erasing the extra loop from
, the unknown character appearing two from the left on line three in the original document. Another possibility would have been to modify
(NAH), but I was satisfied enough with this result that I didn't try
that. I may actually revert to the original form at some point if it
becomes apparent that Sequoyah customarily wrote it that way. There may,
for example, be other documents written in his hand in a museum in
Tahlequah or elsewhere which could be checked.
by inverting
(YV) and removing one of the loops. I don't care for it, though, and am
open to ideas as to how to create a better one using Sequoyah's
handwriting from somewhere on the page.
, the character appearing eight from the left on line one in the original document, which closely resembles
(TLV),
, the character appearing eleven from the left on line two in the original document, which bears some resemblance to
(NAH), and
, the character appearing two from the left on line three in the original document, which I think is probably
(TLI) as I mentioned above.
(MO) has an odd loop off to the left and that
(GO) has an extra vertical line right through the center of the
crossbar. The printed fonts don't have these extra elements. I don't
know why they occur here but, again, I welcome any elucidation that a
Cherokee elder or other learned individual may have to offer on the
subject. Please drop me a line.
Visit these other Cherokee-language links: